Advertisement

  Stock Sponsor
Click here for full stock listings


Published: November 4, 2009 3:00 a.m.

U.S. urges low-level deals as Mideast talks stall

Karen DeYoung and Howard Schneider
Washington Post
Advertisement

CAIRO – The Obama administration has all but abandoned hope for an early resumption of face-to-face negotiations between Israeli and Palestinian leaders or substantive movement toward agreement on a Palestinian state – an acknowledgment that it has fallen short of one of its major initial foreign policy goals.

With virtually no possibility of comprehensive high-level negotiations in the foreseeable future, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has begun to urge the Arabs to encourage Palestinian participation in lower-level talks with Israel on narrow economic, social and security issues of interest to both sides, according to accounts by Arab and Western diplomats.

“We recognize that things have stalled,” Clinton spokesman P.J. Crowley said. “We’re looking at a variety of ways that increase interaction between the parties in some form.”

He described the proposals as “baby steps” that would eventually “create a momentum of their own, and the effort can pick up steam.”

“If there’s a vacuum,” he said, “there are lots of spoilers willing to take advantage. ... We’ve too often in the past seen events spiral into violence.”

The baby-steps approach is similar to the policy advocated by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has argued that cooperation on economic development and other issues would be more effective than “top down” negotiations.

Such cooperation is under way in some areas, particularly West Bank Bask security, but Palestinians have been hesitant, in general, toward the approach for fear that it would delay discussion of more basic issues such as borders.

Palestinian rejection last weekend of Israel’s proposal to limit – but not stop – all construction on Arab land was the culmination of months of stalemate and internal political jockeying on both sides that the Obama administration has been unable to break through.

Clinton said there is a choice to be made between living in the past or building a future for the Palestinians.

In an interview with al-Jazeera television before leaving Morocco, Clinton expressed frustration with years of failure to make progress. Near the end of her husband’s presidency, she said, the two sides “came very close” to agreement. If they had succeeded, she said, “we would not be talking about settlement activity. We would have a Palestinian state. It would have East Jerusalem as its capital. It would be working to further the interests of the Palestinian people.”

“I want to see President Obama achieve this goal of a two-state solution,” she said.