You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Business

  • Oil falls to near $106 after U.S. crude supply jump
    Oil slid from a nine-month high to near $106 a barrel Thursday in Asia after a report showed U.S. crude supplies grew more than expected last week, suggesting demand remains sluggish.
  • Markets cautious as Greece presses on with reforms
    Markets were subdued Thursday as Greece pressed ahead with reforms demanded by its creditors in exchange for crucial bailout cash and as tensions rose in the Persian Gulf over Iran's nuclear program.
  • Ashley abuzz as warehouse hub emerges
    Work on a $70 million Family Dollar Stores Inc. distribution center in Ashley continues to generate optimism in northeast Indiana.In January 2011, when the Matthews, N.C.
Advertisement

No Indian trucks in U.S. soon

– A legal battle between India’s Mahindra & Mahindra and its sole U.S. distributor has thrown into doubt its planned December launch of two mid sized diesel pickup trucks in the United States.

Managing director Anand Mahindra said last week the company now has “no date” for the U.S. launch. Regulatory delays pushed back earlier deadlines.

“We’re still interested in getting into the U.S.,” Mahindra said in an interview, declining further comment because of the legal case. “We don’t want to turn this into a war of words.”

The company’s sole U.S. distributor, Global Vehicles USA Inc., maintains that Mahindra improperly terminated its contract in June after a failed takeover offer.

“The bottom line here is Mahindra now believes this is a huge project. They want us out of the way so they can go direct and save the money we were going to make,” Global Vehicles chief executive John Perez said Friday.

Global Vehicles filed a case in federal court in Georgia on June 14, claiming that Mahindra had violated its contractual obligations and urged the court to block any other U.S. distribution of Mahindra products.