You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Exchange students learn Hoosier ways
    Throughout this month, 40 AFS international high school students from 21 countries are scheduled to arrive in Indiana.
  • Use common sense in Common Core debate
    The national debate over Common Core State Standards has intensified in recent months as several states have begun rejecting the standards in favor of drafting their own. My home state, Indiana, was the first to choose this path.
  • New censorship study reveals what Beijing fears
    While living for more than a decade in China, and using its thriving social media, no question came to mind quite so often as: “Who is the idiot who just censored that online post, and what on Earth was so dangerous about it?
Advertisement

GOP filibuster shoddy rollback

The Senate’s insidious use of judicial nominees as political pawns continued last week with a Republican filibuster of Caitlin J. Halligan.

Voted well-qualified by a unanimous American Bar Association, Halligan was tapped by President Obama to fill a long-vacant seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. She is general counsel for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and has served ably in public posts and private practice; she earned the enthusiastic support of a bipartisan group of legal luminaries, including Miguel A. Estrada, whom President Bush nominated to the D.C. Circuit.

Those who have worked with Halligan say she is a skilled lawyer with moderate views – a depiction that is at odds with the distorted portrait of her painted by Republicans.

GOP lawmakers accused Halligan of being an anti-gun extremist. Why? In 2003, as New York solicitor general, she represented the state in appellate courts when gun manufacturers challenged a suit brought by then-Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. The state ultimately lost, but it was Spitzer, not Halligan, who decidedto pursue this route.

Lawmakers – many of whom hold law degrees – should know better than to ascribe the views of clients to their attorneys.

Others argued that the D.C. Circuit’s diminished caseload did not warrant filling the vacancy; Republicans rightly scoffed at such a ploy when used by Democrats to block GOP appointees.

What happened to the Bush-era bipartisan “Gang of 14” and its pledge to reserve filibusters for those “extraordinary circumstances” in which a nominee’s qualifications or ethics are suspect or her views far outside the mainstream? Last week, four Republicans from that “gang” – John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine – abandoned that worthy agreement.

Halligan’s nomination was blocked for two reasons: to keep a Democratic appointee from joining a bench that is considered a farm team for the Supreme Court; and to avenge the defeat of eminently qualified Republican nominees such as Estrada.

It is a disgrace to the party that Lisa Murkowski of Alaska was the only Republican to endorse an up-or-down vote.

Advertisement