You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Ukraine needs world’s support in thwarting Russia
    After the “anschluss” of Crimea, the Kremlin proceeded in its war on Ukraine with a covert operation in our eastern regions. Russia is sticking to the same routine as in Crimea.
  • ‘STRATEGIC AMBIGUITY’
    I am not for containment in Iran. Let me repeat that, since no one seems to be listening closely: I am unequivocally not for containing Iran. I am also not for announcing that the United States should never contain Iran.
  • School standards receiving rushed treatment
    It’s Holy Week, during which Christians both mourn and celebrate the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, culminating in Easter on Sunday.Gov.
Advertisement

Opportunity for healing offered

Ravi

One man took his own life. A year and a half later, another man was given his back.

Such is the state of the tragic case involving a bullying incident at Rutgers University in New Jersey that turned into a legal and moral quandary, raising questions of hate-crime law, criminal responsibility and cybercivility.

On Sept. 22, 2010, Rutgers student Tyler Clementi jumped to his death from the George Washington Bridge after his roommate, Dharun Ravi, put online a video of an intimate encounter between Clementi and another man.

On March 16, a jury convicted Ravi of invasion of privacy, hindering apprehension, witness tampering and multiple counts of bias intimidation.

Last week Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Glenn Berman sentenced Ravi to 30 days in jail, three years’ probation, 300 hours of community service, a $10,000 fine that will go to help victims of hate crimes, and counseling on cyberbullying and alternate lifestyles. Notably, Berman also advised against the deportation of Ravi, an Indian citizen.

Berman’s sentence was startling not only because Ravi was facing up to 10 years in prison but because it followed the judge’s sharp admonishment of Ravi in court.

“I heard this jury say guilty 288 times,” Berman said, “and I haven’t heard you apologize once.”

The judge aptly labeled Ravi’s actions – first spying on his roommate kissing another man via a webcam and then broadcasting a subsequent encounter – examples of “colossal insensitivity.”

But ultimately, the punishment seems about right, given that the crime includes the reprehensible privacy violations and counts of bias but not the charge of murder. Ravi is not legally responsible for the death of Clementi, his casual cruelty notwithstanding. According to Berman, Ravi did not hate Clementi and thus didn’t merit substantial prison time under New Jersey’s bias-intimidation laws, which usually tie extensive incarceration to simultaneous demonstrations of bias and acts of physical violence.

Depending on the results of an appeal, which both the defense and prosecution are pursuing, Ravi may serve only the relatively merciful jail term.

Potentially more important are other aspects of the punishment – the fine that will contribute to remedying the effects of hate crimes and the community service requirement – that radiate outward, helping to treat the underlying conditions enabling Ravi’s act.

At colleges and universities across the country, students have the technological means to commit once-unimaginable acts of meanness. If history is to be prevented from repeating itself, students ought to be educated about the implications of their activity in cyberspace and guided to tread in that realm – as in all realms – with humanity.

Advertisement