You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • FIVE REASONS WHY OUR PRESIDENTS DISAPPOINT
    Six months after winning re-election, Barack Obama finds himself in some kind of trouble – battered by semi-scandals and bombarded by foreign policy challenges he can’t possibly manage.
  • Burma reforms merit skeptical optimism
    Not many dictators or military juntas willingly give up power. Will Burma’s regime prove the exception? That was the ever-present though mostly unspoken question as President Thein Sein toured Washington, D.C., this week.
  • Russia’s expulsion for spying smells of setup
    In the days of the Soviet Union, street maps of Moscow did not exist for most citizens, or they were deliberately misleading.
Advertisement

Penn State’s complicated cover-up

The trial of ex-Penn State assistant coach Jerry Sandusky ended with a lengthy list of guilty verdicts, but the questions still unanswered go further than what his sentence will be.

A chain of emails has surfaced in an independent investigation concerning the 2001 incident in which Mike McQueary, then a graduate assistant football coach, caught Sandusky in the shower sexually assaulting a young boy. And they reportedly involve the correspondence of several former Penn State officials. However, it’s the presence of the name of the late Joe Paterno, Penn State’s iconic head coach and the former boss of both Sandusky and McQueary, that is so unsettling.

The emails suggest further involvement by Paterno, who died this year. They show that, at a particular moment after the 2001 incident, others favored reporting Sandusky to child welfare authorities. After talking with Paterno, they didn’t think that was such a good idea anymore.

Assuming the accuracy of these emails, what was the full extent of Paterno’s involvement in the alleged cover-up of the scandal? How is it possible for adults to conclude that the “humane” thing to do was to ignore the plight of an abused 10-year-old boy? These questions demand answers, not only to understand what gave rise to the Penn State scandal but also for the sake of past and future cases in which children have been victimized at the hands of adults and were then made to live in shame.

Advertisement