You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.


  • Reports: WH intruder gets far past front door
    WASHINGTON — The intruder who climbed a fence made it farther inside the White House than the Secret Service has publicly acknowledged, the Washington Post and New York Times newspapers reported Monday.
  • Road salt supply low, demand high as winter looms
    The reward for surviving last winter's frigid temperatures and record snowfall, several states are learning, is drastic price increases for road salt — in some cases, five times as expensive as last season.
  • Teens who crossed US border alone enter schools
    The group of mostly Spanish-speaking teenage boys with styled spiky hair and high-top sneakers enthusiastically pecks away on hand-held tablets at the G.W.
Spanier files suit to get email access
PHILADELPHIA – Former Pennsylvania State University President Graham Spanier sued the school for access to emails from 1998 through 2004 that he claims are relevant to an internal probe sparked by allegations of sexual abuse against Jerry Sandusky.
Penn State has refused to grant Spanier access, citing a request from Pennsylvania Attorney General Linda Kelly’s office, according to the complaint filed in state court in Bellefonte, Penn.
Spanier believes “that access to these emails would refresh his recollection significantly and allow him to assist the university fully in its investigation,” according to the complaint.
Spanier’s request is an attack on the attorney general’s directive not to disclose the emails it obtained during the probe, Penn State said.
A hearing in the case is set for Aug. 17.
Spanier was fired in November along with football coach Joe Paterno amid allegations that school officials were aware of Sandusky’s conduct as early as 1998.
– Bloomberg News

Report tackles what Penn St. did, didn’t do

– Joe Paterno defended his football program’s integrity in a 7-month-old letter released Wednesday, a day ahead of a report that could forever mar his legacy.

In the letter, written shortly before his death and confirmed as legitimate by his family, Paterno rejected the notion that Jerry Sandusky’s sexual abuse of boys amounted to a “football scandal” or in any way tarnished the accomplishments of his players or Penn State’s reputation as a whole.

The results of Penn State’s internal investigation into the Sandusky scandal are set to be released this morning in a report that should answer many of the troubling questions swirling around one of the worst scandals in sports history.

A team led by FBI ex-director Louis Freeh interviewed hundreds of people to learn how the university responded to warning signs that its once-revered former assistant football coach – a man who helped Paterno win two national titles for a university that touted “success with honor” – was a serial child molester.

Sandusky was convicted on 45 criminal counts last month at a trial that included gut-wrenching testimony from eight young men who said he abused them as boys. By contrast, the Freeh report, to be released online at 9 a.m. (, will focus on Penn State and what it did – or didn’t do – to protect children.

Eight months after Sandusky’s arrest, it remains unclear how top university officials handled reports dating back at least 14 years that Sandusky was behaving inappropriately with boys he met through his charity, bringing them on campus and forcing them into sex acts.

Among those who will be scouring the Freeh report are school officials trying to repair Penn State’s shattered reputation and ex-players and alumni who remain outraged over Paterno’s ouster in the wake of Sandusky’s arrest. The Hall of Fame coach died from lung cancer in January.

Penn Staters for Responsible Stewardship, an alumni watchdog group that has been highly critical of the school’s board of trustees, issued a 95-point checklist of issues it said it expects to be covered in Freeh’s report “in order for it to be considered a credible, valid summary of the case.”

Lawyers for the young men who testified against Sandusky, and others planning lawsuits, will be reading the findings for what it might mean regarding civil litigation.