You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Hoosier court reinforces lack of hope in justice system
    Recently, the Indiana Supreme Court added to its legacy of contempt for working-class Hoosiers by proclaiming that a deceptively named “right-to-work” law does not violate the Indiana Constitution.
  • Erin's House helps grieving kids cope
    We have all seen the headlines – car accident, one fatality, a male 35 years old – but we sometimes forget the likelihood that there is a child tied to this adult. Maybe he was a father, uncle, brother, cousin or dear friend.
  • Word to the wise: Build vocabulary early
    The PNC Financial Services Group recently hosted the Guinness Book of World Records attempt for largest vocabulary lesson as part of Grow Up Great, our early childhood education program.

An agency we can – thankfully – trust

– A relatively small number of conspiracy theorists claiming the Obama administration somehow “cooked the books” on jobs data were getting a fair amount of attention Friday, but the fact that people indulge some loopy notions at the height of campaign season isn’t a big deal.

The real story about the Bureau of Labor Statistics data is how enormously credible it is.

Financial markets, the media, opposition politicians and everyone else almost uniformly takes it seriously.

If anything, the national pathology is taking the month-by-month errors a little too seriously and not wrestling with sample error, modeling error and the relatively large scale of revisions.

Conspiracy theorists are rare enough to be newsworthy, and widely dismissed as conspiracy theorists.

But note that it doesn’t have to be this way.

Nobody takes Chinese government economic data seriously. If someone told you that Vladimir Putin was juicing jobs data ahead of a campaign, you wouldn’t dismiss him.

And in any kind of transitional democracy situation – think Mexico or Colombia or Poland in 1995 – putting your thumb on the scale of economic information is one of the most obvious uses of incumbent power you can imagine.

And Richard Nixon seems to have seriously considered doing this with the BLS.

But while American presidents certainly do deploy the powers of incumbency, they don’t do it in this abusive way, and the vast majority of people don’t believe they do it in that abusive way.

This is a remarkable fact and it’s a big part of what makes America great.

Trustworthy economic data is a very valuable public good that serves as a useful production input for tons of private businesses.

It also helps smaller-scale government agencies and nonprofits make smarter decisions.

And last but by no means least, precisely because the BLS is credible, presidents know that they’d take an enormous political hit if they were seen as manipulating it.

The result is a stable equilibrium that’s friendly to democracy and capitalist prosperity alike.

It’s not easy to achieve, but it’s important to achieve and it’s something we should celebrate about America. Politicians regularly engage in rhetoric that suggests they believe public agencies will perform poorly.

But it’s not true and the fact that we have lots of great government agencies – the ones producing our federal statistical information not least among them – is part of the strength of America. Long story short, if your business relies on accurate credible statistical information in its planning, you didn’t build that.

Matthew Yglesias is Slate’s business and economics correspondent. Before joining the magazine he worked for ThinkProgress, the Atlantic, TPM Media and the American Prospect. His most recent book is “The Rent Is Too Damn High.”