You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Short-sighted decision shortchanges students
    Since taking office last year, one of the most exciting things I've seen in Indiana has been the growing momentum and support for early-childhood education.
  • In the best interests of Hoosier children
    Earlier this year our state made history by approving the first state-funded pre-kindergarten grant program for low-income families in Indiana.
  • Domestic violence a worldwide scourge
    Many of us have found ourselves shocked at the sight of Super Bowl champion Ray Rice punching his then fiancée, now wife, so hard in the face that she was rendered unconscious.
Advertisement

Parties cautiously inch back from ‘fiscal cliff’

At the risk of spoiling it, we’d like to take note of a quietly growing bipartisan consensus against doing something that might harm U.S. finances. We speak of the broad opposition to another one-year extension of the Social Security payroll tax holiday, which workers have enjoyed for the past two years.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has said she is against an extension, as has Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, a senior member of the Republican majority on the House Ways and Means Committee. Top Senate members of the Finance Committee from both parties have echoed those views. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner has testified that the tax cut “has to be ... temporary.” This is quite a contrast to the partisan fight earlier this year over extending the reduction.

This is not to deny the positive effect of the two-year tax cut, which shaved two percentage points off the 6.2 percent of income (up to $110,000) that workers usually pay into Social Security. Each year, the savings pumped about $100 billion into the labor force’s take-home pay, with the lowest earners benefiting proportionately the most. Nor is it to deny the contractionary effect, other things being equal, of ending the break now, while the economy is still weak.

However, the tax cut was adding to the federal deficit each year. To extend the cut once again risks converting a temporary stimulus into a permanent feature of the tax code. That would harm what’s left of the U.S. government’s fiscal credibility and upset expectations about the long-run flow of federal revenue – making it that much more difficult for Congress to pull off a “grand bargain” on taxes, entitlements and the debt.

If necessary, Congress could mitigate the short-term economic effect of ending the payroll tax cut through other means. The Federal Reserve’s recent announcement of more quantitative easing also reduces the risks to growth. Meanwhile, allowing the payroll tax cut to lapse would help build confidence between the two parties; it will be easier for them to agree on other issues if neither tries to score easy political points by offering yet another year of a popular tax break. Getting the country safely over the “fiscal cliff” will be hard enough without adding a replay of the nasty payroll tax fight to Congress’ burdens.

Advertisement