INDIANAPOLIS – More men’s basketball players are taking advantage of the biggest shot of their life and earning a college diploma.
The latest results from the NCAA’s annual Graduation Success Rate showed a record 74 percent of Division I basketball players from the 2005-06 freshman class left school with a degree, a 6 percentage-point increase over the one-year measurement from the class of 2004-05.
It’s a stunning turnaround for a sport that has traditionally lagged others in the closely watched report.
I’m pretty confident it’s a reflection of the seriousness of the athletes and the coaching staffs to keep students in school and focused on their classes, NCAA President Mark Emmert said during a conference call.
Football Bowl Subdivision players improved their scores by 1 percentage point in the one-year snapshot, hitting 70 percent for the first time.
The overall four-year graduation rate, covering freshman classes from 2002-03 through 2005-06, was 80 percent, matching last year’s record high. Using that measure, men’s basketball and FBS players both came in at 68 percent, with both sports showing modest gains (1 percentage-point increase in FBS and 2 percentage points in basketball).
NCAA officials believe the improvement in its two biggest money-making sports indicates that the more stringent requirements for incoming freshmen, tougher standards to maintain eligibility first passed in 2003, and the focus on the GSR and Academic Progress Rate reports are having an effect.
Last year, Emmert upped the ante by pushing for – and getting – the board of directors to impose harsher sanctions including postseason bans for teams that fall below the APR cutline of 900. That report is released in the spring. Connecticut’s men’s basketball team is the first major school in one of the two big sports to miss the cutline and will be ineligible for this year’s NCAA tournament.
This week’s report showed UConn had a four-year graduation rate of 11 percent.
Ideally, we’d like every student-athlete who enters college to graduate. That’s why they go there, said University of Hartford President Walt Harrison, the longtime chairman of the Division I Committee on Academic Performance.
Some contend the NCAA’s numbers are flawed because they’re calculated differently than the federal statistics, which critics say may portray a more accurate picture of what’s actually happening in classrooms across America.
While both the NCAA and the feds evaluate students over a six-year span, the NCAA’s numbers include transfer students who leave school in good academic standing and earn a degree somewhere else. The feds do not count anyone who leaves their first school, regardless of whether the student or athlete actually earns a degree.