You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Hoosier court reinforces lack of hope in justice system
    Recently, the Indiana Supreme Court added to its legacy of contempt for working-class Hoosiers by proclaiming that a deceptively named “right-to-work” law does not violate the Indiana Constitution.
  • Erin's House helps grieving kids cope
    We have all seen the headlines – car accident, one fatality, a male 35 years old – but we sometimes forget the likelihood that there is a child tied to this adult. Maybe he was a father, uncle, brother, cousin or dear friend.
  • Word to the wise: Build vocabulary early
    The PNC Financial Services Group recently hosted the Guinness Book of World Records attempt for largest vocabulary lesson as part of Grow Up Great, our early childhood education program.

Energy debate losing steam

America’s debate on green energy is pathetic. In the past year, the two biggest green-energy issues in Congress have been whether to strip the Environmental Protection Agency of various authorities and whether to renew a crude subsidy for wind power.

Here’s the objective that Congress should pursue: transitioning the country off carbon emissions without unduly burdening taxpayers, consumers and businesses. The best way to do that is to put a tax on carbon emissions that ramps up over time. Consumer choice would determine how to wring carbon out of the economy, and businesses would also benefit from more certainty about future market conditions. But the closest thing to an energy debate the lame-duck Congress has managed has been a return to the fight over that wind subsidy, which expires at the end of the year.

Some who sympathize with the wind subsidy, known as the production tax credit, say it represents a second-best approach to supporting green energy. In fact, it is not even a third- or fourth-best alternative to a carbon tax. At a cost of $1 billion a year, it offers wind operators a flat tax credit for every kilowatt-hour of electricity they produce. No matter whether the grid doesn’t need the electricity at any given moment or whether the policy blunts the incentive to reduce costs.

If direct subsidies are the only sort of anti-carbon policy that lawmakers can contemplate supporting at this time, they should improve the subsidies. There are many worthwhile ideas and more federal supports than just the wind credit to think about. The availability of green-energy subsidies could, for example, depend on how well generators meet actual electricity demand. Or the government could set subsidy levels in an auction or have them reflect the cheapest players in the market.

The Climate Policy Initiative, meanwhile, reckons that the government could slash costs – saving 40 percent of its money in the case of wind – simply by financing subsidies differently, converting tax credits into taxable cash payments.

It seems unlikely that Congress will see to the credit before it expires, setting up a debate in the new year. That should give lawmakers plenty of time to consider better approaches.