You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Public school backers deserve your backing
    Elections in Indiana are critically important and represent the most fundamental decision-making authority of a representative government. Elections choose our leadership and guide our state’s future.
  • $2 billion surplus is goal, no matter the cost
    Shortly after the close of the fiscal year last June 30, our governor and auditor glowingly reported that our state had a budget surplus of more than $2 billion. How were we able to achieve this?
  • Literacy an investment with lifelong benefits
    September is Literacy Month, a chance to raise awareness about low adult literacy.
Advertisement

Energy debate losing steam

America’s debate on green energy is pathetic. In the past year, the two biggest green-energy issues in Congress have been whether to strip the Environmental Protection Agency of various authorities and whether to renew a crude subsidy for wind power.

Here’s the objective that Congress should pursue: transitioning the country off carbon emissions without unduly burdening taxpayers, consumers and businesses. The best way to do that is to put a tax on carbon emissions that ramps up over time. Consumer choice would determine how to wring carbon out of the economy, and businesses would also benefit from more certainty about future market conditions. But the closest thing to an energy debate the lame-duck Congress has managed has been a return to the fight over that wind subsidy, which expires at the end of the year.

Some who sympathize with the wind subsidy, known as the production tax credit, say it represents a second-best approach to supporting green energy. In fact, it is not even a third- or fourth-best alternative to a carbon tax. At a cost of $1 billion a year, it offers wind operators a flat tax credit for every kilowatt-hour of electricity they produce. No matter whether the grid doesn’t need the electricity at any given moment or whether the policy blunts the incentive to reduce costs.

If direct subsidies are the only sort of anti-carbon policy that lawmakers can contemplate supporting at this time, they should improve the subsidies. There are many worthwhile ideas and more federal supports than just the wind credit to think about. The availability of green-energy subsidies could, for example, depend on how well generators meet actual electricity demand. Or the government could set subsidy levels in an auction or have them reflect the cheapest players in the market.

The Climate Policy Initiative, meanwhile, reckons that the government could slash costs – saving 40 percent of its money in the case of wind – simply by financing subsidies differently, converting tax credits into taxable cash payments.

It seems unlikely that Congress will see to the credit before it expires, setting up a debate in the new year. That should give lawmakers plenty of time to consider better approaches.

Advertisement