You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.


  • Furthermore
  • Clearing the air: State ethics board has chance for strong action
    How can appallingly unethical situations repeatedly be overlooked in Indiana state government?The State Ethics Commission’s agenda today includes a proposed settlement with former schools chief Tony Bennett.
  • Insurrection in education
    When voters elected Glenda Ritz nearly two years ago, they made it clear they didn’t like the direction of Indiana schools under Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett.


Powerless to judge health care value, cost

One argument in the health care debate is that citizens will pursue the most cost-effective care if they have more responsibility to pay for it.

An Indiana Supreme Court ruling this week points out just how difficult it is to find out how to get the best care for the best price.

The case involved patients of Clarian Health Partners who were billed what they deemed unreasonable fees. The court found 5-0 for Clarian, reasoning – as Doug Masson’s Blog pointed out – that the patients had signed a contract to essentially pay whatever fee Clarian charged, reasonable or not.

The court noted: “Clarian considers its chargemaster rates confidential and proprietary. Left unanswered by Clarian is how a patient and a provider can mutually agree to an ‘unambiguous’ and ‘express’ chargemaster fee schedule that is not available to the patient.”