The Daniels e-mails, and their threat to free discussion and debate in educational institutions in Indiana, reflect deep struggles being waged in the American political system.
Rush Limbaugh once remarked on his radio show to the effect that “we (conservatives)” have captured most institutions in the society with the exception of the university. Since politics is usually a contest of ideas, and the development of ideas comes from an understanding of the past and its connection to the present and the future, schools and universities can aptly be seen as “contested terrain.” That is, teachers and students learn about their world through reading, writing, debating and advocating policies, ideas and values in educational settings.
Consequently, if one sector of society wishes to gain and maintain political and economic power, it might see particular value in controlling the ideas disseminated in educational institutions. During the dark days of the Cold War, professors who had the “wrong” ideas were fired. Professional associations in many disciplines rewarded scholars who worked within accepted perspectives on history, political science, literature or sociology and denied recognition to others. The preferred ideas trickled down to primary and secondary education. Most professors and teachers who suffered as a result of their teaching were merely presenting competing views so that their students would have more informed reasons for deciding on their own what interpretations of subject matter made the most sense.
American history was a prime example of how controversial teaching would become. Most historians after World War II who wrote and taught about the American experience emphasized that elites made history, men made history more than women, social movements were absent from historical change, history moved in the direction of consensus rather than conflict, and the United States always played a positive role in world history. European occupation of North America, the elimination of native peoples, building a powerful economy on the backs of a slave system, and a U.S. pattern of involvement in foreign wars were all ignored or slighted.
Howard Zinn, a creator and product of the intellectual turmoil of the ’60s, presented us with a new model for examining U.S. history, indeed all history. His classic text, “A People’s History of the United States,” compellingly presented a view of history that highlighted the roles of indigenous people, workers, women, people of color, people of various ethnicities and all others who were not situated at the apex of economic, political or educational institutions. He taught us that we needed to be engaged in the struggles that shaped people’s lives to learn what needs to be changed, how their conditions got to be what they were, and how scholar/activists might help to change the world. Perhaps most important, Zinn demonstrated that participants in people’s struggles were part of a “people’s chain”: the long history of movements and campaigns that have sought to bring about change. As he wrote in his autobiography, “You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train: A Personal History of Our Times”:
“What we choose to emphasize in this complex history will determine our lives. If we see only the worst, it destroys our capacity to do something. If we remember those times and places – and there are so many – where people have behaved magnificently, this gives us the energy to act, and at least the possibility of sending this spinning top of a world in a different direction. And if we do act, in however small a way, we don’t have to wait for some grand utopian future. The future is an infinite succession of presents, and to live now as we think human beings should live, in defiance of all that is bad around us, is itself a marvelous victory.”
In the 1970s the American Legislative Exchange Council was formed by wealthy conservatives and corporations such as Koch Industries, ExxonMobil and AT&T, which invested millions of dollars to organize lobbying groups, support selected politicians in all 50 states, create think tanks and in other ways strategize about how to transform American society to increase the wealth and power of the few. ALEC lobbyists and scholars developed programs and legislation around labor, health care, women’s issues, the environment and education that were designed to reverse progressive development of government and policy.
Speakers at ALEC events have included Govs. Rick Perry, Scott Walker, Jan Brewer, John Kasich and Daniels. ALEC legislative programs include lobbying for charter schools, challenging teachers’ unions, revisiting school curricula to include materials that deny climate change and more effectively celebrate the successes of the Bill of Rights in U.S. history.
The conservative Bradley Foundation has awarded $400 million over the last decade to organizations supporting school vouchers, right-to-work and traditional marriage laws, and global warming deniers. Two of the four recipients of the organization’s 2013 award for support of “American democratic capitalism” were Roger Ailes, CEO of Fox News, and Daniels.
Associations that lobby for restricting academic freedom in higher education include David Horowitz’s Freedom Center and the National Association of Scholars, funded by the conservative Sarah Scaife, Bradley, and Olin foundations, among others. NAS seeks to bring together scholars whose work opposes multiculturalism, affirmative action, concerns about climate change and the “liberal” bias in academia.
The current NAS president, Peter Wood, contributed a blog article in the Chronicle of Higher Education on July 18, entitled “Why Mitch Daniels Was Right About Howard Zinn.” Wood wrote that “a governor worth his educational salt should be calling out faculty members who cannot or will not distinguish scholarship from propaganda, or who prefer to substitute simplistic storytelling for the complexities of history.”
Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States” is a history of how social movements of workers, women, people of color, native peoples and others often left out of conventional accounts have made and can make history.
This is a part of history that political and economic elites, influential organizations such as ALEC, the Bradley Foundation and education-oriented groups such as NAS do not want included in course curricula – in middle school, high school or the university.
If education at any level is to be shaped by the principle of academic freedom, it must encourage student exposure to a variety of theories, perspectives and points of view. It is in an environment of discussion and debate that rigorous and critical thought emerges.
Efforts to expunge certain scholars such as Zinn from educational curricula contradict the spirit of free and rigorous thought.