You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

Advertisement

Pushing back Obamacare deadlines isn’t worth the wait

On Thursday, representatives of the federal contractors who built HealthCare.gov stated the obvious in front of a House panel: The government did not leave enough time to test the website before its error-filled Oct. 1 launch. The next question, a growing number of lawmakers now insist, is whether the government will leave people enough time to sign up for coverage before they are fined for lacking health insurance.

“Given the existing problems with the website,” Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., wrote to President Barack Obama, “I urge you to consider extending open enrollment beyond the current end date of March 31, 2014.” Nine other Senate Democrats signed a similar letter. The move would delay the penalty for lacking coverage, which is set to kick in next spring. Others want to go further, canceling the penalty for all of next year.

Neither is a good idea.

Despite the intolerable failure of the Obama administration to warn the country that HealthCare.gov would not work at launch, there is still plenty of time to make the required fixes. The first major deadline is Dec. 15, when people have to apply to obtain coverage that starts on Jan. 1. People don’t need insurance then, though, to avoid the penalty. Resolving a point of confusion, the Obama administration clarified last week that anyone signed up by March 31 will not have to pay a penalty. That’s more than five months from now.

IPad-toting members of Congress in Thursday’s hearing offered differing accounts about the current ease of using HealthCare.gov, but the site has improved since Day One. Even if it takes some weeks more to get the site in reasonable order, insurance buyers will probably have plenty of time to obtain coverage before running afoul of the penalty.

Why not delay the penalty, just in case? Attacking the so-called individual mandate makes for great politics, but following through on the delay would destabilize the new and vulnerable insurance market.

Next year, the law will oblige insurance companies to accept pretty much anyone, regardless of age or health. The trade-off is that everyone will be required to buy into the system so that insurance companies can have enough healthy customers to keep premiums for everyone reasonable. The penalty against individuals lacking health care coverage is a crucial tool in the effort to drive people into the new system. Delay it, and you’ll get fewer people signing up in the first part of next year, and insurance companies will demand, with good reason, to renege on the rates they are offering for next year’s coverage. Lawmakers do not need and should not attempt to make that outcome any more likely.

On Friday, Jeffrey Zients, the site’s new point man, said the HealthCare.gov system will work by December. He and everyone else had better hope that its bungled rollout hasn’t turned off too many people permanently. If Congress wants to help, it could make sure the necessary funds are appropriated to complete the Affordable Care Act’s implementation.

Advertisement