You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Colleges

  • Top 4 on alert for rivalry week
    It’s rivalry week, arguably the best lineup of games all season. It doesn’t matter who’s favored or if one team has three wins on the season – anything and everything is possible.
  • Leaders unchanged in playoff rankings
    Alabama, Oregon, Florida State and Mississippi State remained the top four teams in the College Football Playoff rankings on Tuesday heading into a weekend when just about all the contenders are facing challenging rivals.
  • Indiana high school honors Hill for cancer fight
    College basketball player Lauren Hill's Indiana high school retired her jersey number this weekend in honor of her inspirational fight to continue playing despite having brain cancer.
Advertisement

After input, NCAA group to craft restructuring proposals

There is no suggestion within the NCAA of blowing things up and even the idea of splitting off the big-money BCS schools into their own division gets little traction.

But the leadership of the governing body for collegiate athletics has to become “more nimble, more strategic, appropriately representative,” said Nathan Hatch, chair of the NCAA’s board of directors.

“I do think it’s a very important (time),” Hatch, the president at Wake Forest, said Wednesday after a two-day meeting on restructuring. “I do think there’s some frustration with the current governance model, and there are inherent tensions between big schools and small schools and how representation is done. There is a sense the board, for a variety of reasons, has been too much involved in smaller matters, legislative issues, and not high-level strategy.

After getting input from nine different groups, including athletic directors, faculty, coaches’ associations and the Student-Athlete Advisory Committee, the board Wednesday agreed on several key points:

•A more transparent, faster and simple governance process is needed.

•School presidents would continue to lead the division, with the board focusing more on overall strategy and vision and less on day-to-day operations.

•While there is a wish to maintain a single Division I, some schools should have the leeway to decide how best to support their athletes financially – a way to resolve the so-called stipend debate.

A seven-member committee established in August to oversee restructuring will now draft proposals, which will be presented to the full membership at the NCAA convention Jan. 15-18 in San Diego. Hatch said he hopes there will be a final plan by spring.

“If you look at where we were in the spring and where we are now, there’s a lot more commonality now than there was six months ago because of these discussions,” said Morgan Burke, Purdue’s athletic director and the president of the 1A Athletic Directors’ Association. “We still have a lot of work to do. Governance is a tricky thing whether it be in Washington, whether it be in Indy, whether it be in the U.N. If you go too fast, you can fracture this whole thing.”

But athletic directors do want to have more of a say, particularly when it comes to policies that shape college athletics.

The presidents would still set the NCAA’s “broad policies,” approve budgets and choose the NCAA president, Burke said. But day-to-day policies, like rules for recruiting and officiating, are better left to ADs.

It’s similar to the governance structure on every college campus.

“The presidents are clearly the final decision-makers, those are the people we report to. But (Purdue President) Mitch Daniels doesn’t try to make operational decisions in athletics,” Burke said. “I don’t think they want to get into that level of detail, and I think that the system, over time and unintentionally, has sucked them down into the details like that.”

Such a change could allow larger schools to finally be able to give their athletes so-called stipends.

The board has twice approved a rules change that would have allowed schools to give athletes money for expenses not covered by their scholarships. But the full membership has overridden it, with some smaller schools saying they were not interested or did not have the money.

Advertisement