Great goal tending tonight he was off the wall with some saves I still don't understand how a team takes hacks at our leading scored and goalie and gets away with it they stood up for their goalie and we got a 4 nun penalty .who is behind the passive play???
Posted by joe arnett (35 posts) at 11:03 pm Saturday
Good game tonight.
Posted by Writes Right Shoots Left (290 posts) at 12:08 am Sunday
I would like to know what the passive play is all about too. What would Graham's response to that question be? He made such a point of telling us he would have his team playing a very physical, aggressive style of hockey. Well?? Did he mean this season?
Posted by hockey fix (100 posts) at 12:29 am Sunday
Like the goaltending in echl. Not impressed with coaching performance thus far. Lying to the public about an aggresive, physical team will not get you very far.
Posted by Larry Carcione (62 posts) at 3:28 am Sunday
Witnessed so many time in the first period. Lang, Vask, and Marino skate up to a Reading player who was against the boards and brake right in front of him. Simply spraying him with ice instead of making a hit.
Then part way through the second Sydlowski and some other guys got physical and the game picked up.
I love some ones past comment about those 3 needing to just go for simple goals. Not this fancy Datsyuk stuff every single play.
I understand good stick handling but at times it seems to be just to much. SHOOT THE PUCK!!!
Posted by DavexCore (91 posts) at 4:11 pm Sunday
Seems like the Komets have had a lot of ties and shootouts. Have the Komets won ANY of the shootouts? I believe this stat would make our goalie situation suspect.
Posted by Hockey Junkie (301 posts) at 7:57 am Wednesday