You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Hoosier court reinforces lack of hope in justice system
    Recently, the Indiana Supreme Court added to its legacy of contempt for working-class Hoosiers by proclaiming that a deceptively named “right-to-work” law does not violate the Indiana Constitution.
  • Erin's House helps grieving kids cope
    We have all seen the headlines – car accident, one fatality, a male 35 years old – but we sometimes forget the likelihood that there is a child tied to this adult. Maybe he was a father, uncle, brother, cousin or dear friend.
  • Word to the wise: Build vocabulary early
    The PNC Financial Services Group recently hosted the Guinness Book of World Records attempt for largest vocabulary lesson as part of Grow Up Great, our early childhood education program.

Expand concerns for Web security

Republicans this week plan to put yet another criticism of the Affordable Care Act front-and-center on the House floor. It is another political weapon, but if treated seriously, this one could lead to useful reform.

For the past several weeks, Republicans have claimed that the website and the systems behind it may not be secure enough to keep Americans’ personally identifying information safe.

They have selectively released evidence they collected through their oversight efforts to make it seem as though the site has major security vulnerabilities. In response, Democrats presented selective evidence of their own. The Department of Health and Human Services, meanwhile, reported that “there have been no successful security attacks on, and no person or group has maliciously accessed personally identifiable information from the site.” The administration also said that the site is fully compliant with federal security standards.

That’s presumably true, but those standards could use some upgrading. no doubt has some vulnerabilities, as do many other sites. Data breaches of well-protected government– and, for that matter, private – systems containing sensitive information indicate that would hardly be unique in this regard, even if it is a uniquely tempting political target. ACA sites don’t collect the breadth of sensitive personal data that other federal systems, such as Medicare’s, do.

The House Republicans’ bill would require the government to notify victims of any illegal security breach in the ACA’s systems within two business days. If that makes sense for, though, why not require the same of other sensitive federal systems, too? If Republicans want to pass useful policy, rather than simply throw another bomb at the ACA, they should detach their proposal from anti-Obamacare politics and vote on a broader federal transparency requirement, or even renew their push for more ambitious federal cybersecurity reforms.

There are Democrats who would join in such a project; a proposal to update federal data security standards last year passed the House unanimously. A bigger effort would be well worth it, though the two-day notification requirement is probably unrealistic.

It would be unfortunate, though, if Republicans succeeded in scaring Americans away from enrolling in health-insurance plans, undoubtedly a goal for some. Many uninsured Americans, in particular, have a lot more to gain than lose from logging into, examining their options, calculating the government subsidies they qualify for – and signing up.