You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

Advertisement
Joe Heller l Heller Syndication

In other words … State of the Union

Now begins the time of collective action

President Barack Obama’s patience with Congress is at an end. Or so he and his aides made it appear before his State of the Union address. The talk was of executive action to boost the economy and fight inequality – measures the president could take unilaterally. This will be a “year of action”; look out for the presidential pen and the presidential phone. In response, various Republican lawmakers warned Obama not to threaten.

When the inevitable partisan preliminaries gave way to the actual speech, however, Obama’s tone was relatively non-confrontational. The most significant, a $10.10 per hour minimum wage for all workers on federal contracts, affects a sliver of the U.S. workforce and applies only to future contracts. The rest were either familiar (more “manufacturing institutes”), hollow (a summit on working families), promising but vague (a new starter savings account) or harmless (yet another review of federal training programs).

If that’s all there is to it, future historians may look back on Obama’s “year of action” as neither transformational nor tyrannical but rather, at most, moderately helpful to his larger agenda.

Far from dictating to Congress, Obama repeatedly acknowledged the necessity of legislative support for his agenda. Indeed, he invited it. Two items on his list – extended unemployment benefits and a higher minimum wage for all workers – should receive support but, in the Republican-controlled House, probably won’t.

Others, though, have at least a chance at passage: updating patent law, authority to pursue tariff-slashing trade deals in Asia and Europe; and Obama’s welcome pitch for housing finance reform all should win some GOP backing. The president proposed expanding the earned-income tax credit to include childless workers, which would improve work incentives and lift many single men and women out of poverty.

This idea also has the virtue, politically, of taking what was originally a GOP program and reshaping it in a way that’s at least not inconsistent with recent anti-poverty proposals from Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. If Republicans are serious about their concern for poverty and inequality, they’ll take the president up on this proposal.

Entitlements and a cure for America’s long-term fiscal imbalance, once ostensibly key Obama concerns, no longer rank as priorities. And in a speech devoted overwhelmingly to domestic issues, Obama spent just enough time on foreign policy to demonstrate again his determination to limit U.S. commitments in the Mideast. He stressed the end of U.S. military interventions, particularly in Afghanistan, and he vowed to veto any move by Congress to sanction Iran pending his top priority, negotiations on its nuclear programs. He had little to say about ongoing turmoil in Egypt and even less about East Asia.

If the Republicans think their political interest lies in rejecting everything Obama favors, as their political base sometimes seems to prefer, they could easily find material in the president’s speech, and in the attitude the White House projected prior to it, to justify that stance.

On the other hand, if they prefer to pursue tangible achievements, the president has laid out several opportunities that don’t involve betraying party principle. Given that the government is divided, and that the Constitution precludes either legislative or executive dictatorship, cooperation across party lines is the only sensible course.

Advertisement