You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Short-sighted decision shortchanges students
    Since taking office last year, one of the most exciting things I've seen in Indiana has been the growing momentum and support for early-childhood education.
  • In the best interests of Hoosier children
    Earlier this year our state made history by approving the first state-funded pre-kindergarten grant program for low-income families in Indiana.
  • Domestic violence a worldwide scourge
    Many of us have found ourselves shocked at the sight of Super Bowl champion Ray Rice punching his then fiancée, now wife, so hard in the face that she was rendered unconscious.

Overhaul needed in physician training

Here’s a deal you might be interested in. You get $10 billion a year of taxpayers’ money to do something you may well have done anyway. You don’t need to say what you spend it on, or why. That’s the nice arrangement the federal government grants U.S. hospitals when it comes to training doctors.

The system works as follows: After four years of medical school, a new doctor gets a residency, almost always at a hospital. This lasts from three to seven years, depending on the specialty, and involves working with patients under the supervision and instruction of more senior doctors.

In exchange, hospitals receive about $10 billion a year from Medicare.

Why should Medicare be providing the bulk of what’s spent on graduate medical education in the United States? Mostly, it’s a historical accident.

But this way of directing the cash has unfortunate consequences, as a recent report from the Institute of Medicine, an independent research group in Washington, explains. Payments to hospitals are all but guaranteed, “regardless of program performance, efficiency, or quality of training.”

There’s no attention to the right mix of specialties, which means a shortage of primary care physicians. Nobody in a position of authority is even asking what kinds of doctors the country needs.

The amount hospitals get for each resident varies, but not according to the quality of the training provided or any other reasonable criterion.

Slowing the growth of U.S. health care spending is a top fiscal priority.

Changing the way doctors work – which means changing the way they’re trained – is part of what is required.

As a first step, the institute suggests using some of the existing funding for pilot projects designed to test reforms.

These could be overseen by a new group within the office of the secretary of Health and Human Services, with the job of setting goals and making sure they’re met.

Eventually, though, residencies should no longer be funded through the current system.

The U.S. health care system is changing, and it needs to change more.

The way it trains doctors and the way their training is paid for are vital aspects of this broader task of reform.