Starting in 1996, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention self-imposed a ban on researching firearms deaths in the United States. The agency had been cowed by the National Rifle Association and the Republican-controlled House, among others, who accused it of being a fellow traveler of those pushing for gun control.
Fast forward to December 2012. The world was shocked by the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in which 28 people, including 20 first-graders, were shot to death. The following month, President Barack Obama issued a direct order to then-Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius to lift this prohibition and “conduct or sponsor research into the causes of gun violence and the ways to prevent it.”
Since then, the CDC has done little to nothing on this issue. Congress once again clamped down on dedicated funding for this valuable research.
Cold, hard facts should always be welcome in a debate as serious as this one. And for the first time in 24 years, it looks like Americans and their lawmakers finally will get some.
The House-approved $1.4 trillion federal spending package includes $25 million for gun safety research. That funding will be split between the CDC and National Institutes of Health.
Without the needed data in hand, we can't have an intelligent discussion on gun violence in America. The CDC is uniquely qualified to do this research, yet it wasn't allowed to do so for more than 20 years for purely political reasons.
“As the nation's health protection agency, CDC saves lives and protects people from health threats,” reads its mission statement. “To accomplish our mission, CDC conducts critical science and provides health information that protects our nation against expensive and dangerous health threats, and responds when these arise.”
With its action to fund research on this uniquely American concern, Congress gave meaning to the CDC's mission.
More importantly, it said it would no longer be afraid of what researchers find on the subject of gun violence.
– Kokomo Tribune